Filed: Jan. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING DECEMBER 19, 2014 RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DISMISSING CERTAIN OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, APPEAR, AND COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS WILLIAM J. MART NEZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the December 19, 2014 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe (the "Recommendation") (ECF No. 298) Dismissing Certain Opt-In Plaintiffs for Failure to Prosecute, Appear, and Comply with Court Orders . The Recommendation is i
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING DECEMBER 19, 2014 RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DISMISSING CERTAIN OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, APPEAR, AND COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS WILLIAM J. MART NEZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the December 19, 2014 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe (the "Recommendation") (ECF No. 298) Dismissing Certain Opt-In Plaintiffs for Failure to Prosecute, Appear, and Comply with Court Orders . The Recommendation is in..
More
ORDER ADOPTING DECEMBER 19, 2014 RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DISMISSING CERTAIN OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, APPEAR, AND COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS
WILLIAM J. MARTÍNEZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the December 19, 2014 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe (the "Recommendation") (ECF No. 298) Dismissing Certain Opt-In Plaintiffs for Failure to Prosecute, Appear, and Comply with Court Orders . The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation.1 (ECF No. 298, at 5.) Despite this advisement, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation have to date been received.
The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's analysis was thorough and sound, and that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note ("When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation."); see also Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) ("In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate's report under any standard it deems appropriate.").
In accordance with the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows:
(1) The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (ECF No. 298) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and
(2) The following Opt-In Plaintiffs are hereby DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f) and/or 41(b) and D.C. COLO.LCivR 41.1:
Melanie Armijo, Nancy Betzen, Kathleen Burke, Debra Coaty, Donald Ederer, Cindy Hang, Kristi Lambert, Bernadette Lujan, Tammy Mahoney, Erish Major, Jr., Shawna Redman, Sarah Smith, Phylis Solnick, Lysandra Ybarra, Jacqueline Zelaya, Jay Abbit, Robert Armijo, Dan Decker, Tricia Duran, Cherry Fiano, Lisa Galbraith, Dixie Garden, Tiffany Greenwald, Sarah Johnson, Joyce Jones, Tina Nelson, Dawn Norlund, Raquel Rodriguez, Loretta Sanders, Ana Schubert, Christopher Sheeder, Jason Sweasy, Ann Marie Uwandu, Calvin West, Alton Williams, and Brenda Young.
