ORDER MARSHALING EXPERT WITNESS DISCOVERY AND TESTIMONY

ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.

At the hearing on April 24, 2015, the court and counsel discussed, inter alia, deadlines for filing any additional motions and any corresponding responses relating to the disclosure of additional expert witnesses by the government. This order is entered to provide a reasonable procedure to address the issues concerning such expert testimony in this case.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the defendant may file additional motions under Fed. R. Evid. 702, 703, or 704 by May 25, 2015, and the government may file a response within 21 days of the filing of the corresponding motion;

2. That to resolve pretrial issues concerning such witnesses, the following procedural protocol shall be used:

a. That for each additional putative expert witness with respect to whom the defendant objects for any reason, the defendant shall provide the following:

1. whether the defendant contends that the testimony of the expert is unnecessary or irrelevant; and if so, why;

2. whether the defendant objects to the qualifications of the witness; and if so, why (stated in detail); and

3. whether the defendant objects to any opinion to be offered by the expert; and if so:

a. which opinion; and

b. the specific basis for any objection stated and presented in terms of Fed. R. Evid. 401 and/or 702 (a), (b), (c), or (d), 703, or 704, i.e., whether the objection impugns the relevancy of the opinion, the qualifications of the expert, the sufficiency of the facts and data used in support of the opinion, the principles and methods on which the expert relied in support of the opinion, how the expert has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case relevant to the opinion, or the facts or data used in forming an opinion on the subject; and

b. That based on any motion and its corresponding response, the court may