U.S. v. SMITH, 15-mj-01053-MEH-1. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20150604a14
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL E. HEGARTY , Magistrate Judge . The Court, having considered the Defendant Donald Smith's Unopposed Motion to Vacate Trial Date and Schedule Status Conference (Document #15), within which Mr. Smith moves for an ends of justice exclusion of time from speedy trial calculations, hereby grants the motion. Mr. Smith has addressed the factors articulated in United States v. West, 828 F.2d 1468 , 1469-70 (10 th Cir. 1987) concerning the adequacy of the record in an ends of justi
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL E. HEGARTY , Magistrate Judge . The Court, having considered the Defendant Donald Smith's Unopposed Motion to Vacate Trial Date and Schedule Status Conference (Document #15), within which Mr. Smith moves for an ends of justice exclusion of time from speedy trial calculations, hereby grants the motion. Mr. Smith has addressed the factors articulated in United States v. West, 828 F.2d 1468 , 1469-70 (10 th Cir. 1987) concerning the adequacy of the record in an ends of justic..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL E. HEGARTY, Magistrate Judge.
The Court, having considered the Defendant Donald Smith's Unopposed Motion to Vacate Trial Date and Schedule Status Conference (Document #15), within which Mr. Smith moves for an ends of justice exclusion of time from speedy trial calculations, hereby grants the motion.
Mr. Smith has addressed the factors articulated in United States v. West, 828 F.2d 1468, 1469-70 (10th Cir. 1987) concerning the adequacy of the record in an ends of justice finding. The Court finds that the ends of justice outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and warrant the exclusion of time beginning June 2, 2015 through and including September 3, 2015 from the speedy trial calculation as provided in 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
