FUENTES v. COLVIN, 14-cv-03346-REB. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20150612890
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN , District Judge . Proceeding under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by filing a Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge [#14] 1 on June 9, 2015. Thus, under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(e), the civil action should be assigned to a magistrate judge. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a) and (b) this action shall b
Summary: ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN , District Judge . Proceeding under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by filing a Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge [#14] 1 on June 9, 2015. Thus, under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(e), the civil action should be assigned to a magistrate judge. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a) and (b) this action shall be..
More
ORDER
ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.
Proceeding under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) by filing a Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge [#14]1 on June 9, 2015. Thus, under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(e), the civil action should be assigned to a magistrate judge.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a) and (b) this action shall be co-assigned to a full-time magistrate judge;
2. That the case caption shall include the initials of both the district judge and the magistrate judge to whom the case is assigned; and
3. That once a magistrate judge has been co-assigned, this court will issue an order of reference under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(e) assigning the action to the magistrate judge then currently assigned to the case.
FootNotes
1. "[#14]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.
Source: Leagle
