Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BEYER v. COLVIN, 1:13-cv-02977-KMT. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20150619c43 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA , Magistrate Judge . This Court, having reviewed the parties' Stipulated Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) (the Motion), and being fully apprised in its premises, ORDERS that the Motion (Document #22) is granted. Defendant shall pay $3,500.00 of attorney fees to Plaintiff pursuant to the EAJA. It is further ordered that if, after receiving the Court's EAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1) determines
More

ORDER

This Court, having reviewed the parties' Stipulated Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (the Motion), and being fully apprised in its premises,

ORDERS that the Motion (Document #22) is granted. Defendant shall pay $3,500.00 of attorney fees to Plaintiff pursuant to the EAJA. It is further ordered that if, after receiving the Court's EAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1) determines upon effectuation of the Court's EAJA fee order that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, and (2) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, the fees will be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney.

However, if there is a debt owned under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff's attorney.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer