HAMILTON v. U.S., 13-cv-00051-REB-KMT. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20150804f49
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE TAFOYA'S July 7, 2015 ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN , District Judge . The matter before me is the Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge Tafoya's July 7, 2015 Order [#58], 1 filed July 17, 2015. I overrule the objection. Defendant's objections pertain to non-dispositive matters that were referred to the magistrate judge for resolution. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), I may modify or set aside any portio
Summary: ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE TAFOYA'S July 7, 2015 ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN , District Judge . The matter before me is the Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge Tafoya's July 7, 2015 Order [#58], 1 filed July 17, 2015. I overrule the objection. Defendant's objections pertain to non-dispositive matters that were referred to the magistrate judge for resolution. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), I may modify or set aside any portion..
More
ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE TAFOYA'S July 7, 2015 ORDER
ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.
The matter before me is the Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge Tafoya's July 7, 2015 Order [#58],1 filed July 17, 2015. I overrule the objection.
Defendant's objections pertain to non-dispositive matters that were referred to the magistrate judge for resolution. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), I may modify or set aside any portion of a magistrate judge's order which I find to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Having reviewed the magistrate judge's order; the apposite motion, response, and reply and plaintiff's objections and defendant's corresponding response thereto, I conclude that the magistrate judge's order is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the objections stated in Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge Tafoya's July 7, 2015 Order [#58], filed July 17, 2015, are overruled.
FootNotes
1. "[#58]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.
Source: Leagle
