ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS TO AND ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.

The matters before me are (1) the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#45],1 filed July 14, 2015; and (2) the objections stated in plaintiff's Objection to Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#45] [#46], filed July 28, 2015. I overrule plaintiff's objections, adopt the recommendation, and grant defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), I have reviewed de novo all portions of the recommendation to which objections have been filed. I have considered carefully the recommendation, objections, and applicable caselaw, as well as the arguments raised and authorities cited by the parties both in their original briefs and in the objection and response.

The recommendation is detailed and well-reasoned. The magistrate judge's thorough analysis of the issues raised by defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction over them in this forum requires no festooned reiteration by this court. After de novo review, I wholeheartedly approve and adopt the recommendation as an order of this court.

Plaintiff's objections are imponderous and without merit. Like his motion, his objection focuses myopically on his own contacts within the forum, rather than the salient contacts of either defendant. Those contacts are too ephemeral and tenuous to allow this court to assume personal jurisdiction over these defendants in this forum. Moreover, even assuming arguendo that defendants' contacts with this forum were minimally sufficient, I concur with the magistrate judge that it nevertheless would offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice to assume personal jurisdiction over them here.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#45], filed July 14, 2015, is approved and adopted as an order of this court;

2. That the objections stated in plaintiff's Objection to Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#45] [#46], filed July 28, 2015, are overruled;

3. That Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Amended Complaint [#35], filed October 2, 2014, is granted;

4. That plaintiff's claims against defendant are dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants in this forum;

5. That judgment without prejudice shall enter on behalf of defendants, Flagship Restaurant Group, a Nebraska company; and Nick Hogan, an individual, against plaintiff, Joe Anzures, on all claims for relief and causes of action; and

6. That this case is closed.