TRAYLOR v. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 14-cv-02952-RPM. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20150925h67
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2015
Summary: ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICHARD P. MATSCH , Senior District Judge . On June 22, 2015, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. This Court granted the second renewed motion to withdraw by plaintiff's counsel on March 13, 2015. There has been no response to the defendant's motion for summary judgment. On August 20, 2015, this Court entered an Order to Show Cause requiring Sean S. Traylor to file his response on or before September 14, 2015, failing in which judgment will ent
Summary: ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICHARD P. MATSCH , Senior District Judge . On June 22, 2015, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. This Court granted the second renewed motion to withdraw by plaintiff's counsel on March 13, 2015. There has been no response to the defendant's motion for summary judgment. On August 20, 2015, this Court entered an Order to Show Cause requiring Sean S. Traylor to file his response on or before September 14, 2015, failing in which judgment will ente..
More
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RICHARD P. MATSCH, Senior District Judge.
On June 22, 2015, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. This Court granted the second renewed motion to withdraw by plaintiff's counsel on March 13, 2015. There has been no response to the defendant's motion for summary judgment. On August 20, 2015, this Court entered an Order to Show Cause requiring Sean S. Traylor to file his response on or before September 14, 2015, failing in which judgment will enter. That order was mailed to the plaintiff at his address of record and there has been no return mail. Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED that judgment shall enter dismissing this civil action with prejudice. The counterclaim of the defendant is denied given that this civil action was initiated with the assistance of counsel and the dismissal of this civil action is, in effect, specific performance of the release.
Source: Leagle
