Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MARTINEZ v. COLVIN, 13-cv-00469-RM. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20151027913 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2015
Summary: ORDER RAYMOND P. MOORE , District Judge . Upon review of the parties' Stipulated Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d), and full consideration of this matter, the court hereby GRANTS the parties' Stipulated Motion. (ECF No.22). Pursuant to this order, Defendant shall, pursuant to the EAJA, pay $4,750 of attorney fees and expenses to Plaintiff, as stipulated by the parties. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 596-97 (2010
More

ORDER

Upon review of the parties' Stipulated Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and full consideration of this matter, the court hereby GRANTS the parties' Stipulated Motion. (ECF No.22).

Pursuant to this order, Defendant shall, pursuant to the EAJA, pay $4,750 of attorney fees and expenses to Plaintiff, as stipulated by the parties. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 596-97 (2010). This payment shall constitute a full and complete release of any and all EAJA fee claims relating to this matter that Plaintiff may have.

However, if Plaintiff has relevant federal debt which, under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. §3716(c)(3)(B)(2006)), is subject to the requirements of the Anti-Assignment provisions of the Social Security Act, (42 U.S.A. §407(a)), the Defendant shall reduce its payment by such amount and pay any remaining EAJA fees by a check made out to Plaintiff sent to Plaintiff's stipulated address.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer