Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. STAGNER, 15-cr-00386-CMA. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20160108925 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2016
Summary: PROTECTIVE ORDER CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court as a result of an unopposed motion of the United States for a Protective Order (Doc. 18), pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16. Upon a showing of good cause in support of entry of a protective order to protect dissemination of confidential information and/or sensitive data or records and without objection from Defendant, IT IS ORDERED: 1. This Protective Order shall apply to all docum
More

PROTECTIVE ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court as a result of an unopposed motion of the United States for a Protective Order (Doc. 18), pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16. Upon a showing of good cause in support of entry of a protective order to protect dissemination of confidential information and/or sensitive data or records and without objection from Defendant,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. This Protective Order shall apply to all documents, materials, manuals, books, papers, data, or other objects produced pursuant to the production duties created by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This Protective Order shall apply to the Defendant, his counsel, and any of his staff, consultants, and experts.

2. Information designated "CONFIDENTIAL — DEFENDANT MAY VIEW BUT NOT POSSESS" ("CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION") shall be information that is confidential and may include correspondence generated by and sent by Defendant; communications between the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Federal Bureau of Prisons, documents regarding the operation of the federal prison at Florence, Colorado that could impact institutional security and/or safety; documents that contain information that is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act; documents that contain law enforcement sensitive or implicates law enforcement techniques; documents that implicate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPPA"); documents that contain agency deliberative process sensitive information; documents that concern the institutional adjustment of Defendant, and/or information that is protected by the Privacy Act of 1974. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall not be disclosed or used for any purpose except the preparation and trial of this case. The protections granted by this Protective Order shall not be waived.

3. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be reproduced electronically for litigation management purposes only. Electronically reproduced CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION must retain the mark "CONFIDENTIAL — DEFENDANT MAY VIEW BUT NOT POSSESS."

4. Documents, materials, and/or information that may be shown to the Defendant are designated as CONFIDENTIAL by marking them "CONFIDENTIAL — DEFENDANT MAY VIEW BUT NOT POSSESS." While information may be shown to the Defendant, the Defendant shall not be permitted to retain them.

5. In addition to the restrictions set forth in Paragraph 4, CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall not, without the consent of the party producing it or further Order of the Court, be disclosed to any person, except that such information may be disclosed to:

a) Attorneys actively working on this case; b) Persons regularly employed or associated with the attorneys actively working on the case whose assistance is required by said attorneys in the preparation for trial, at trial, or at other proceedings in this case; c) Expert witnesses and consultants retained in connection with this proceeding, to the extent such disclosure is necessary for preparation, trial or other proceedings in this case; d) The Court, and necessary Court staff; and e) Other persons by written agreement of the parties.

1. Prior to disclosing any CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION to any person listed in Paragraphs 5(c) and/or 5(e), counsel shall provide such person with a copy of this Protective Order and obtain from such person a written acknowledgment stating that he or she has read this Protective Order and agrees to be bound by its provisions. Counsel shall maintain a log identifying the person to whom the information was provided, what information is provided, and when the Protective Order was provided to them. All such acknowledgments and the log shall be retained by counsel and shall be subject to in camera review by the Court if good cause for review is demonstrated by the opposing party.

2. In the event that a party desires to use CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION as an exhibit to a Court document, the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall be filed under seal in accordance with D.C.Colo.LCrR 47.1 and District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing Procedures, and must retain the mark "CONFIDENTIAL — DEFENDANT MAY VIEW BUT NOT POSSESS."

3. If additional disclosure is needed of CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, counsel for the party seeking additional disclosure will contact counsel for the producing/designating party to work out an appropriate procedure for such disclosure. If the parties cannot resolve the dispute within ten (10) business days, either party may file an appropriate motion with the Court. Said motion may attach the disputed CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION as an exhibit to the motion. If the disputed CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION is attached as an exhibit to such a motion, it shall be filed under seal in accordance with D.C.Colo.LCrR 47.1 and District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing Procedures, and must retain the mark "CONFIDENTIAL — DEFENDANT MAY VIEW BUT NOT POSSESS."

4. At the conclusion of this case, unless other arrangements are agreed upon, each document and all copies (electronic and physical) thereof which have been designated as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall be returned to the party that designated it CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, or the parties may agree that the defense may maintain a copy in a sealed envelope in case needed for later proceedings.

5. This Protective Order may be modified by the Court at any time for good cause shown following notice to all parties and an opportunity for them to be heard.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer