U.S. v. 2005 FORD F-150 SUPERCREW XLT, 15-cv-2296-WYD-GPG. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20160113795
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER WILEY Y. DANIEL , Senior District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte regarding the Parties' Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 11). This Court ordered that the above action be referred to part-time Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on December 8, 2015. However, the statute governing consent jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. 636(c), indicates that consent jurisdiction for a part-time magistrate judge is only appropriate upo
Summary: ORDER WILEY Y. DANIEL , Senior District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte regarding the Parties' Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 11). This Court ordered that the above action be referred to part-time Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on December 8, 2015. However, the statute governing consent jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. 636(c), indicates that consent jurisdiction for a part-time magistrate judge is only appropriate upon..
More
ORDER
WILEY Y. DANIEL, Senior District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte regarding the Parties' Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 11). This Court ordered that the above action be referred to part-time Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on December 8, 2015. However, the statute governing consent jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), indicates that consent jurisdiction for a part-time magistrate judge is only appropriate upon the consent of the parties, if the chief judge of the district court certifies that a full-time magistrate judge is not reasonably available, and the assignment to the part-time magistrate judge is designated by concurrence of the majority of all the judges of the district court.
Since the required conditions for such consent jurisdiction to a part-time magistrate judge do not exist in this case, I must vacate the Order of Reference (ECF No. 12) predicated on the Consent (ECF No. 11). Accordingly, I will remain as the presiding judge on this matter, and Magistrate Judge Gallagher will remain as the magistrate judge on the matter, but without consent jurisdiction.
Source: Leagle
