SMITH v. TOWN OF KREMMLING, 15-cv-00459-RPM. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20160115q91
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2016
Summary: ORDER RICHARD P. MATSCH , Senior District Judge . UPON Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order, the Court, being fully advised in the premises and for good cause shown, hereby: GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion. The expert disclosure deadlines in the Scheduling Order entered in this matter shall be extended as follows: • The party bearing the burden of persuasion on issues for which expert opinion is to be offered shall designate the expert and provide opposing counsel with all
Summary: ORDER RICHARD P. MATSCH , Senior District Judge . UPON Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order, the Court, being fully advised in the premises and for good cause shown, hereby: GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion. The expert disclosure deadlines in the Scheduling Order entered in this matter shall be extended as follows: • The party bearing the burden of persuasion on issues for which expert opinion is to be offered shall designate the expert and provide opposing counsel with all ..
More
ORDER
RICHARD P. MATSCH, Senior District Judge.
UPON Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order, the Court, being fully advised in the premises and for good cause shown, hereby:
GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion. The expert disclosure deadlines in the Scheduling Order entered in this matter shall be extended as follows:
• The party bearing the burden of persuasion on issues for which expert opinion is to be offered shall designate the expert and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before February 12, 2016
• The parties shall designate all contradicting experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before March 11, 2016.
Source: Leagle
