Scarborough v. U.S., 15-cv-00242-KLM. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20160212823
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2016
Summary: ORDER KRISTEN L. MIX , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Leave to Depose Inmates [#34] 1 (the "Motion"). Defendant seeks an Order allowing it to conduct the deposition of two incarcerated individuals. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(B), "[a] party must obtain leave of court . . . if the deponent is confined in prison." Plaintiff Aaron Scarborough, #94024-020, and Jorge J. Solano-Moreta, #11611-069, (a designated non-party at fault, see [#
Summary: ORDER KRISTEN L. MIX , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Leave to Depose Inmates [#34] 1 (the "Motion"). Defendant seeks an Order allowing it to conduct the deposition of two incarcerated individuals. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(B), "[a] party must obtain leave of court . . . if the deponent is confined in prison." Plaintiff Aaron Scarborough, #94024-020, and Jorge J. Solano-Moreta, #11611-069, (a designated non-party at fault, see [#2..
More
ORDER
KRISTEN L. MIX, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Leave to Depose Inmates [#34]1 (the "Motion"). Defendant seeks an Order allowing it to conduct the deposition of two incarcerated individuals. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(B), "[a] party must obtain leave of court . . . if the deponent is confined in prison." Plaintiff Aaron Scarborough, #94024-020, and Jorge J. Solano-Moreta, #11611-069, (a designated non-party at fault, see [#27]) are presently incarcerated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#34] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant may take the depositions of these two individuals with regard to this litigation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the depositions shall take place at Federal Bureau of Prisons facilities in Florence, Colorado, on February 24, 2016, or other date to be determined in advance when Plaintiff is available to attend, pursuant to written notice.
FootNotes
1. "[#34]" is an example of the convention the Court uses to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the Court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). This convention is used throughout this Order.
Source: Leagle
