Filed: Jun. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2017
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation [sic] Motion for Entry of Order Directing Binding Arbitration and Stay of Action [Docket No. 48] filed by plaintiff and defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. and the parties' Supplement to Stipulated Motion for Entry of Order Directing Binding Arbitration, Stay of Action, and Adminstrative [sic] Closure [Docket No. 50]. Plaintiff filed this action seeking to compel arbitration. Docket No. 1. Plaintiff
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation [sic] Motion for Entry of Order Directing Binding Arbitration and Stay of Action [Docket No. 48] filed by plaintiff and defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. and the parties' Supplement to Stipulated Motion for Entry of Order Directing Binding Arbitration, Stay of Action, and Adminstrative [sic] Closure [Docket No. 50]. Plaintiff filed this action seeking to compel arbitration. Docket No. 1. Plaintiff ..
More
ORDER
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation [sic] Motion for Entry of Order Directing Binding Arbitration and Stay of Action [Docket No. 48] filed by plaintiff and defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. and the parties' Supplement to Stipulated Motion for Entry of Order Directing Binding Arbitration, Stay of Action, and Adminstrative [sic] Closure [Docket No. 50].
Plaintiff filed this action seeking to compel arbitration. Docket No. 1. Plaintiff and defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. filed a motion requesting the Court to stay the case and compel arbitration. Docket No. 48. The Court entered a minute order requesting the positions of defendants Uber USA, LLC and Rasier, LLC with respect to the motion and arbitration and whether the parties opposed administratively closing the case in lieu of staying the case. Docket No. 49. The parties have responded that Uber USA, LLC and Rasier, LLC were "included within `Uber' for purposes of the Motion, shall be bound by the Court's order on the Motion, and shall be parties to and bound by the results of the arbitration." Docket No. 50 at 1, ¶ 1. The parties request that the proceeding be both stayed and administratively closed. Id. at 1-2. The effect of administrative closure is to terminate pending motions. D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2.
Wherefore, it is
ORDERED that the Stipulation [sic] Motion for Entry of Order Directing Binding Arbitration and Stay of Action [Docket No. 48] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is further
ORDERED that, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, this action shall be administratively closed and the parties shall proceed with arbitration in accordance with the terms in the parties' Stipulation and Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate [Docket No. 48 at 2-4]. It is further
ORDERED that the request for a stay is denied. It is further
ORDERED that, no later than twenty days after the completion of the arbitration proceeding, the parties shall file a status report advising the Court whether they believe the case should be reopened for good cause for any further proceedings in this Court or whether the case may be dismissed.
