Royal Crest Dairy, Inc. v. Continental Western Insurance Company, 17-cv-00949-RM-KLM. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20180109770
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER RAYMOND P. MOORE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the December 18, 2017, Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix (the "Recommendation") (ECF No. 50) to deny Defendant's "Motion to Disqualify George Keys from Acting as Plaintiff's Appraiser and For Other Relief" (ECF No. 30). The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). The Recommendation advised the parties that specific wri
Summary: ORDER RAYMOND P. MOORE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the December 18, 2017, Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix (the "Recommendation") (ECF No. 50) to deny Defendant's "Motion to Disqualify George Keys from Acting as Plaintiff's Appraiser and For Other Relief" (ECF No. 30). The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). The Recommendation advised the parties that specific writ..
More
ORDER
RAYMOND P. MOORE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the December 18, 2017, Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix (the "Recommendation") (ECF No. 50) to deny Defendant's "Motion to Disqualify George Keys from Acting as Plaintiff's Appraiser and For Other Relief" (ECF No. 30). The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).
The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF No. 50 at page 9.) Despite this advisement, no objections to the Recommendation have to date been filed by any party and the time to do so has expired. (See generally Docket.)
The Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Mix's analysis was thorough and sound, and that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note ("When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation."); see also Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) ("In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate's report under any standard it deems appropriate."). The Recommendation is, therefore, adopted as an order of this Court.
In accordance with the foregoing, the Court:
(1) ADOPTS the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 50) in its entirety; and
(2) DENIES Defendant's Motion to Disqualify George Keys from Acting as Plaintiff's Appraiser and For Other Relief (ECF No. 30).
Source: Leagle
