Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Gay, 19-cr-4-RM. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20190516962 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 15, 2019
Latest Update: May 15, 2019
Summary: DEFENDANT SHAUN GAYS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A MENTAL HEALTH EXAMINATION RAYMOND P. MOORE , District Judge . Comes Now, the Defendant Shaun Gay, by and through his CJA appointed counsel, Peter Hedeen, and hereby requests this Honorable Court for an Order authorizing a psychiatric or psychological examination of the defendant by a certified psychiatrist or psychologist for the purpose of determining Mr. Martinez' mental competency pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4241(a). As grounds therefore, Mr. Gay
More

DEFENDANT SHAUN GAYS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A MENTAL HEALTH EXAMINATION

Comes Now, the Defendant Shaun Gay, by and through his CJA appointed counsel, Peter Hedeen, and hereby requests this Honorable Court for an Order authorizing a psychiatric or psychological examination of the defendant by a certified psychiatrist or psychologist for the purpose of determining Mr. Martinez' mental competency pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(a). As grounds therefore, Mr. Gay states as follows:

1. On December 3, 2018, the government filed a one count indictment against Mr. Gay alleging that on December 2, 2018, Mr. Gay took money from a person which belonged to TCF Bank, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). See Doc.1. On December 18, 2018, undersigned counsel entered an appearance in the present matter. See Doc. 8.

2. On March 19, 2019, Mr. Gay appear before this Court and entered a plea of guilty to the single count in the indictment. The Court set sentencing for June 12, 2019.

3. Since the entry of the guilty plea, Undersigned Counsel has reviewed mental health records and has met with Mr. Gay, and has reason to believe that Mr. Gay may be suffering from a mental disease or defect that could be rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceeding against him or to assist properly in his defense. The privilege between attorney and client prevent further disclosure of these issues. In addition, Mr. Gay has had well-documented issues with mental health in his past, including those documented in his prior case 10-cr-00373-WYD.

4. On May 9, 2019, Mr. Gay submitted a letter to the Court regarding his case. This letter clearly demonstrates that Mr. Gay may be suffering from a mental disease or defect that could be rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceeding against him or to assist properly in his defense. See Doc. 29. Based on the aforementioned concerns, Undersigned Counsel requests the Court to order a psychiatric or psychological evaluation for purposes of determining competency.

5. Unless impracticable, the psychiatric or psychological examination shall be conducted in the suitable facility closest to the court. See 18 U.S.C. § 4247(b).

6. Undersigned counsel also requests that a report of the evaluation be filed with the Court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4247(c). Undersigned Counsel would request that copies of the report be tendered to the parties pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4247(c).

7. Following the evaluation and report, Undersigned Counsel requests that the Court order counsel to contact chambers to set a date for hearing on Mr. Gays' competency, should such hearing be necessary.

8. Undersigned Counsel further requests that the Court vacate all current dates and deadlines, to be reset upon conclusion of the competency evaluation. Until a determination is made regarding Mr. Gay's competency, counsel cannot effectively communicate with Mr. Gay and Mr. Gay cannot assist counsel in preparation of a defense or to prepare for sentencing.

9. The Court held a phone conference regarding these issues on May 13, 2019, and at that time Assistant United States Attorney Kurt Bohn stated that he had no objection to the present Motion.

WHEREFORE, Undersigned Counsel respectfully requests that this Court issue an order authorizing a mental health examination under 18 U.S.C. § 4241(b), vacating current deadlines and the sentencing date, and setting a status conference or a deadline for the parties to contact chambers in order to reschedule the applicable dates.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer