ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

PHILIP A. BRIMMER, Chief District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States agistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix filed on August 19, 2019 [Docket No. 104]. The Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Recommendation was served on August 20, 2019. No party has objected to the Recommendation.

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) ("[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings"). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is "no clear error on the face of the record."1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 104] is accepted.

2. Defendant's Renewed Motion to Strike Portions [of] Dr. Engelstad's Expert Disclosure [Docket No. 100] is granted.

3. The testimony of Dr. Mark Engelstad identified in subparagraphs (b) through (e) of Plaintiff's Expert Witness Disclosures [Docket No. 100-1] is excluded pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(1).