Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wallace v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., 1:19-cv-01359-RM-NYW. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20191010914 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER RAYMOND P. MOORE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the August 23, 2019, recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang (ECF No. 49) to grant Plaintiff's motion to dismiss this case without prejudice (ECF No. 47) and to deny as moot two other pending motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 23, 24). The Court adopts the recommendation, and it is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The recommendation advised th
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the August 23, 2019, recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang (ECF No. 49) to grant Plaintiff's motion to dismiss this case without prejudice (ECF No. 47) and to deny as moot two other pending motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 23, 24). The Court adopts the recommendation, and it is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the recommendation. No party objected to the recommendation, and the time to do so has expired. "In the absence of a timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's report under any standard it deems appropriate." Summers v. State of Utah, 927 F.3d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991).

The magistrate judge evaluated Plaintiff's motion and determined that it should be construed as a notice of dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and that the case should be dismissed without prejudice. The Court discerns no error with respect to the magistrate judge's analysis and agrees with her recommendation.

Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the recommendation (ECF No. 49) and GRANTS the motion to dismiss this case without prejudice (ECF No. 47), DENIES AS MOOT the pending motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 23, 24), and directs the Clerk to CLOSE this case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer