SIMMS v. SEAMAN, 27 A.3d 373 (2011)
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Number: inadvctco111215000019
Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 07, 2011
Latest Update: Sep. 07, 2011
Summary: The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 129 Conn.App. 651 , 23 A.3d 1 , is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly determine that claims of fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress brought against attorneys for conduct that occurred during judicial proceedings were barred as a matter of law by the doctrine of absolute immunity " NORCOTT and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or deci
Summary: The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 129 Conn.App. 651 , 23 A.3d 1 , is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly determine that claims of fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress brought against attorneys for conduct that occurred during judicial proceedings were barred as a matter of law by the doctrine of absolute immunity " NORCOTT and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decis..
More
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 129 Conn.App. 651, 23 A.3d 1, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that claims of fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress brought against attorneys for conduct that occurred during judicial proceedings were barred as a matter of law by the doctrine of absolute immunity?"
NORCOTT and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Source: Leagle
