FRANK v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, 45 A.3d 97 (2012)
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Number: inadvctco120912000001
Visitors: 13
Filed: May 23, 2012
Latest Update: May 23, 2012
Summary: The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 288 , 37 A.3d 834 , is granted, limited to the following issues: "1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court or did it fail to properly credit the findings of the hearing officer "2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes 46b-120(3) is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the pl
Summary: The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 288 , 37 A.3d 834 , is granted, limited to the following issues: "1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court or did it fail to properly credit the findings of the hearing officer "2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes 46b-120(3) is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the pla..
More
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 288, 37 A.3d 834, is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court or did it fail to properly credit the findings of the hearing officer?
"2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 46b-120(3) is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the plaintiff's conduct in the classroom regarding one of his students, because the plaintiff could not have been on notice that his behavior could be considered `emotional abuse' as defined by the defendant's regulations?"
NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Source: Leagle
