HAYNES v. CITY OF MIDDLETOWN, 70 A.3d 1067 (2013)
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Number: inadvctco131119000334
Visitors: 29
Filed: Jul. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2013
Summary: The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 142 Conn.App. 720 , 66 A.3d 899 , is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court judgment setting aside the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs should be affirmed on the ground that the plaintiffs had not satisfied the identifiable person, imminent harm exception to governmental immunity " NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or
Summary: The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 142 Conn.App. 720 , 66 A.3d 899 , is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court judgment setting aside the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs should be affirmed on the ground that the plaintiffs had not satisfied the identifiable person, imminent harm exception to governmental immunity " NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or ..
More
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 142 Conn.App. 720, 66 A.3d 899, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court judgment setting aside the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs should be affirmed on the ground that the plaintiffs had not satisfied the identifiable person, imminent harm exception to governmental immunity?"
NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Source: Leagle
