COLEY v. CITY OF HARTFORD, 94 A.3d 639 (2013)
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Number: inadvctco141103000011
Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2013
Summary: The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 140 Conn.App. 315 , 59 A.3d 811 (AC 33904), is granted, limited to the following issues: "In affirming the trial court's entry of summary judgment for the defendant in this case: (1) Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes 46b-38b did not apply to this case ; (2) Did the Appellate Court properly determine that any duty created by the statutory scheme was not owed to the plaintiff's dece
Summary: The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 140 Conn.App. 315 , 59 A.3d 811 (AC 33904), is granted, limited to the following issues: "In affirming the trial court's entry of summary judgment for the defendant in this case: (1) Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes 46b-38b did not apply to this case ; (2) Did the Appellate Court properly determine that any duty created by the statutory scheme was not owed to the plaintiff's deced..
More
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 140 Conn.App. 315, 59 A.3d 811 (AC 33904), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"In affirming the trial court's entry of summary judgment for the defendant in this case: (1) Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 46b-38b did not apply to this case?; (2) Did the Appellate Court properly determine that any duty created by the statutory scheme was not owed to the plaintiff's decedent?; and (3) Did the Appellate Court properly determine that any duty was discretionary?"
Source: Leagle
