DEANE v. KAHN, 91 A.3d 906 (2014)
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Number: inadvctco140903000006
Visitors: 24
Filed: May 21, 2014
Latest Update: May 21, 2014
Summary: The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 149 Conn.App. 62 , 88 A.3d 1230 , is granted, limited to the following issues: "1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court enforcing a right-of-way by deed on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove its location or use "2. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court enforcing a right-of-way by implication or necessity on the ground that the plai
Summary: The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 149 Conn.App. 62 , 88 A.3d 1230 , is granted, limited to the following issues: "1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court enforcing a right-of-way by deed on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove its location or use "2. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court enforcing a right-of-way by implication or necessity on the ground that the plain..
More
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 149 Conn.App. 62, 88 A.3d 1230, is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court enforcing a right-of-way by deed on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove its location or use?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court enforcing a right-of-way by implication or necessity on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove what use was made of the right-of-way at the time the riverfront portion of the property became effectively landlocked?"
Source: Leagle
