IN RE NEVAEH W., 113 A.3d 69 (2015)
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Number: inadvctco150907000008
Visitors: 19
Filed: Apr. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2015
Summary: The petition by the Commissioner of Children and Families for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 154 Conn.App. 156 , 107 A.3d 539 (2014), is granted, limited to the following issues: "1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes 17a-112 (k) provides that the trial court is deprived of authority to enter a dispositional order of termination of parental rights if it fails to address in writing each segment of all seven statutory factors "2. If the answ
Summary: The petition by the Commissioner of Children and Families for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 154 Conn.App. 156 , 107 A.3d 539 (2014), is granted, limited to the following issues: "1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes 17a-112 (k) provides that the trial court is deprived of authority to enter a dispositional order of termination of parental rights if it fails to address in writing each segment of all seven statutory factors "2. If the answe..
More
The petition by the Commissioner of Children and Families for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 154 Conn.App. 156, 107 A.3d 539 (2014), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 17a-112 (k) provides that the trial court is deprived of authority to enter a dispositional order of termination of parental rights if it fails to address in writing each segment of all seven statutory factors?
"2. If the answer to question one is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the remedy for a trial court's failure to address in writing each segment of all seven statutory factors is reversal of the judgment?"
Source: Leagle
