STATE v. PARNOFF, 127 A.3d 185 (2015)
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Number: inadvctco160404000006
Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2015
Summary: The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 160 Conn.App. 270 , 125 A.3d 573 (2015), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court correctly determine in its de novo review of the record, that there was insufficient evidence to support the defendant's conviction for disorderly conduct pursuant to General Statutes 53a-182 (a)(1) because the state's proof of that offense's threat element did not satisfy the first amen
Summary: The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 160 Conn.App. 270 , 125 A.3d 573 (2015), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court correctly determine in its de novo review of the record, that there was insufficient evidence to support the defendant's conviction for disorderly conduct pursuant to General Statutes 53a-182 (a)(1) because the state's proof of that offense's threat element did not satisfy the first amend..
More
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 160 Conn.App. 270, 125 A.3d 573 (2015), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court correctly determine in its de novo review of the record, that there was insufficient evidence to support the defendant's conviction for disorderly conduct pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-182 (a)(1) because the state's proof of that offense's threat element did not satisfy the first amendment's `fighting words' doctrine?"
Source: Leagle
