Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Acevedo v. Colvin, 3:15-cv-0054(VAB). (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Connecticut Number: infdco20160421986 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2016
Summary: RULING VICTOR A. BOLDEN , District Judge . Upon review under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and there being no objections to the Recommended Ruling of United States Magistrate Judge William I. Garfinkel (ECF No. 17), that Recommended Ruling is hereby APPROVED AND ADOPTED with the following modification: on page one of the opinion, after the citation to "[Doc #12]," the Court adds a footnote that reads: "While the Commissioner did not file a motion, the Co
More

RULING

Upon review under 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and there being no objections to the Recommended Ruling of United States Magistrate Judge William I. Garfinkel (ECF No. 17), that Recommended Ruling is hereby APPROVED AND ADOPTED with the following modification: on page one of the opinion, after the citation to "[Doc #12]," the Court adds a footnote that reads: "While the Commissioner did not file a motion, the Court construes the Commissioner's memorandum [Doc #12] as a motion."

Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED. Defendant's request to affirm the Commissioner's decision (ECF No. 12), which the Court construes as a motion, is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer