Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PITTERMAN v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, 3:14-cv-967 (JCH). (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Connecticut Number: infdco20170706b15 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 04, 2017
Summary: JANET C. HALL , District Judge . DEPOSITION DESIGNATION RULING RE: DEPOSITION OF JAMES O'CONNOR 1 PAGE/LINE OBJECTION 2 5/3 - 7/19 O/R 7/20 - 7/24 SUST. 8/20 - 9/7 O/R 9/23 - 10/4 O/R 10/5 - 11/8 O/R 11/16 - 15/19 O/R 16/2 - 17/9 O/R 17/22 - 1
More

DEPOSITION DESIGNATION RULING RE: DEPOSITION OF JAMES O'CONNOR1 PAGE/LINE OBJECTION2 5/3 - 7/19 O/R 7/20 - 7/24 SUST. 8/20 - 9/7 O/R 9/23 - 10/4 O/R 10/5 - 11/8 O/R 11/16 - 15/19 O/R 16/2 - 17/9 O/R 17/22 - 19/17 SUST. 19/18 - 20/25 O/R 33/15 - 34/9 O/R 34/23 - 36/6 O/R 36/13 - 36/25 SUST. 37/13 - 38/4 O/R 38/14 - 39/8 SUST. 40/5 - 53/4 SUST. 53/5 - 53/25 The court understands defendant withdrew its objection and has now counter-designated. Therefore, no ruling is necessary. 54/1 - 54/21 SUST. 66/4 - 78/21 SUST.

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. As to each Rule 403 objection, the court weighed the probative value of the deposition testimony against any prejudicial effect. If the objection was overruled, the court in overruling the objection found the probative value outweighed the prejudicial effect.
2. The shorthand "O/R" indicates that the objection to the testimony identified in Column One was overruled. The shorthand "SUST." indicates that the objection was sustained.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer