Crowder v. Farinella, 3:17-cv-1135 (VAB). (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Connecticut
Number: infdco20171129982
Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2017
Summary: RULING ON MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT VICTOR A. BOLDEN , District Judge . Christopher H. Crowder moves for leave to file an Amended Complaint. ECF No. 18. As the defendants have not yet responded to the Complaint, ECF No. 1, Mr. Crowder may amend his Complaint once as of right. Therefore, leave is not required, and Mr. Crowder's motion to amend is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to docket the Amended Complaint. In the Initial Review Order, the Court dismissed Mr. Crowder's claims against de
Summary: RULING ON MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT VICTOR A. BOLDEN , District Judge . Christopher H. Crowder moves for leave to file an Amended Complaint. ECF No. 18. As the defendants have not yet responded to the Complaint, ECF No. 1, Mr. Crowder may amend his Complaint once as of right. Therefore, leave is not required, and Mr. Crowder's motion to amend is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to docket the Amended Complaint. In the Initial Review Order, the Court dismissed Mr. Crowder's claims against def..
More
RULING ON MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
VICTOR A. BOLDEN, District Judge.
Christopher H. Crowder moves for leave to file an Amended Complaint. ECF No. 18. As the defendants have not yet responded to the Complaint, ECF No. 1, Mr. Crowder may amend his Complaint once as of right. Therefore, leave is not required, and Mr. Crowder's motion to amend is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to docket the Amended Complaint.
In the Initial Review Order, the Court dismissed Mr. Crowder's claims against defendants Lightner, Moore, and Greene. ECF No. 9 at 10-12. In the Amended Complaint, Mr. Crowder supplements his allegations regarding medical care, withdraws his claim against Ms. Greene, and reasserts his claims against Ms. Lightner and Mr. Moore. Mr. Crowder has not alleged new facts that would alter the analysis in the Initial Review Order. His claims against Ms. Lightner and Mr. Moore therefore remain dismissed for the reasons stated in the Initial Review Order.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
