S. MARTIN TEEL, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.
The debtor has filed a Motion to Reopen Case in which he requests that the case be reopened so that he may file a Motion to Avoid Lien recorded by a creditor, Discover Bank, against his exempt property. The debtor's Motion to Avoid Lien assumes that the judgment lien is void by reason of 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(1), but that provision does not void a judicial lien that attached prepetition. As explained in Wrenn v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co. (In re Wrenn), 40 F.3d 1162, 1164 (11th Cir. 1994):
The judgment was recovered in 2015. The debtor does not allege when the judgment was recorded in the land records and thus attached to his property. See D.C. Code § 15-102 (a judgment is enforceable as lien against real property from the date it is filed and recorded in the office of the Recorder of Deeds of the District of Columbia). If the judgment was recorded with the Recorder of Deeds postpetition, the debtor needs to file an Amended Motion to Reopen to say so, and to attach thereto as an exhibit, and marked as an exhibit, a revised Motion to Avoid Lien asserting that the lien is ineffective for that reason.
If the judgment was recorded with the Recorder of Deeds prepetition, the judgment lien is not made ineffective by 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(1), but the debtor might seek under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1)(A) (or some other provision) to avoid the lien if he can establish a factual basis for doing so. However, his Motion to Avoid Lien does not invoke § 522(f)(1)(A) or any other basis for avoiding the lien (other than 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(1), which as noted above is not a basis for avoiding a prepetition judgment lien).
I will grant the debtor 35 days to file an Amended Motion to Reopen Case (for which no fee will be charged), attaching thereto as an exhibit, and marked as an exhibit, a revised Motion to Avoid Lien that he would pursue if the case is reopened and that sets forth a valid basis for avoiding the lien at issue. If the debtor fails timely to file an Amended Motion to Reopen Case, I will deny the Motion to Reopen without prejudice to the debtor's filing a later motion to reopen with payment of the fee for filing a motion to reopen.
The debtor ought to serve any Amended Motion to Reopen Case on the affected creditor, with notice under LBR 9013-1(b)(3) of the opportunity to oppose the Amended Motion to Reopen Case. The debtor has not properly served the Motion to Reopen. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9014(b) provides that service of a motion in a contested matter must comply with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7004. Rule 7004(b)(3) provides that service of a motion be made within the United States by first class mail postage prepaid:
The debtor has served his Motion to Reopen on Duane R. Demers, who appears to have served as counsel for Discover Bank in the proceeding in which it obtained the default judgment for which it recorded the judgment lien against the debtor's property, but such service does not satisfy Rule 7004(b)(3).
It is thus
ORDERED that the debtor's Motion to Reopen Case (Dkt. No. 61) will be denied unless within 35 days after entry of this order the debtor files an Amended Motion to Reopen Case (for which no fee will be charged), attaching thereto as an exhibit, and marked as an exhibit, a revised Motion to Avoid Lien that he would pursue if the case is reopened and that sets forth a valid basis for avoiding the lien at issue, with the debtor to serve any such Amended Motion to Reopen Case on the affected creditor with LBR 9013-1(b) notice of the opportunity to oppose the Amended Motion to Reopen Case. It is further
ORDERED that the Motion to Avoid Lien (Dkt. No. 62) is stricken as filed prior to the case being reopened and as not setting forth a valid basis for avoiding the lien at issue.