ZADRAN v. OBAMA, 05-2367 (RWR). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20120206805
Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2012
Summary: ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. The May 12, 2011 order issued by Judge Hogan granted the government's motion to designate as protected under the Protective Order governing the Guant namo Bay detainee litigation "sensitive but unclassified information falling within one of the following six categories": 1. Names and/or other information that would tend to identify certain U.S. government employees, FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force members, or contractors — specifically, law enforcemen
Summary: ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. The May 12, 2011 order issued by Judge Hogan granted the government's motion to designate as protected under the Protective Order governing the Guant namo Bay detainee litigation "sensitive but unclassified information falling within one of the following six categories": 1. Names and/or other information that would tend to identify certain U.S. government employees, FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force members, or contractors — specifically, law enforcement..
More
ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
The May 12, 2011 order issued by Judge Hogan granted the government's motion to designate as protected under the Protective Order governing the Guantánamo Bay detainee litigation "sensitive but unclassified information falling within one of the following six categories":
1. Names and/or other information that would tend to identify certain U.S. government employees, FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force members, or contractors — specifically, law enforcement officers, agents, translators, intelligence analysts, or interrogators, all below the Senior Executive Service or General Officer level — [or] the family members of detainees.
2. Information that would reveal the existence, focus, or scope of law enforcement or intelligence operations, including the sources, witnesses, or methods used and the identity of persons of interest.
3. Information indicating the names or locations, including geo-coordinates, of locations of interest as they pertain to counter-terrorism intelligence gathering, law enforcement, or military operations, where the Government has not previously acknowledged [publicly] its knowledge of those names or locations.
4. Information that would reveal the Government's knowledge of telephone numbers, websites, passwords, passcodes, and e-mail addresses used by known or suspected terrorists, or discussions of the manner in which known or suspected terrorists use these methods for communications with one another.
5. Information regarding the use, effectiveness, or details regarding the implementation of certain interrogation approaches and techniques approved by Executive Order 13491 and described in the Army Field Manual No. 2-22.3.
6. Certain administrative data, operational "nicknames," code words, dates of acquisition, including dates of interrogations, and FBI case names and file numbers, contained in the intelligence documents included in the factual returns.
In re Guantánamo Bay Detainee Litig., 787 F.Supp.2d 5, 8 (D.D.C. 2011). The respondents have filed an unopposed motion to deem protected information highlighted in the proposed public factual return for petitioner Abdul Haq. Upon review of the material submitted by the respondents, and in light of the petitioner's consent, it is hereby
ORDERED that the respondents' motion [377] to deem as protected the material highlighted in the accompanying proposed public factual return be, and hereby is, GRANTED, and the information identified by the respondents with gray and green highlighting in the version of the factual return submitted under seal is deemed protected under paragraphs 10 and 34 of the Protective Order governing the Guantánamo Bay detainee litigation. It is further
ORDERED that the parties confer and agree upon a properly redacted version of this factual return that addresses and resolves all the concerns of the parties, and that the parties agree can be filed on the public docket. Respondents shall file that version by March 9, 2012.
Source: Leagle
