Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 11-1482 (RJL). (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Columbia Number: infdco20120301b75 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER [Dkt. #10 and #35] RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. For the reasons set forth in Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, and based on Court's review of both parties' arguments and the agency record, it is this 29 th day of February, 2012 hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #10] is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [#35] is DENIED; and it is further ORDER
More

ORDER [Dkt. #10 and #35]

RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.

For the reasons set forth in Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, and based on Court's review of both parties' arguments and the agency record, it is this 29th day of February, 2012 hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #10] is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [#35] is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that the FDA is permanently enjoined, until 15 months following the issuance of new regulations implementing Section 201(a) of the Tobacco Control Act that are substantively and procedurally valid and permissible under the United States Constitution and federal law, from enforcing against Plaintiffs in this action the new textual and graphic warnings required by Section 201(a) of the Tobacco Control Act.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer