GRIMES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 08-2024 (RJL). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20120427787
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. On March 2, 2012, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit remanded this action for the Court to "consider the effect of the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and `state on the record the reasons for granting or denying [the summary judgment] motion.'" Grimes v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 11-7053 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 2, 2012) (per curiam) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)). Therefore, this Court directs the parties t
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. On March 2, 2012, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit remanded this action for the Court to "consider the effect of the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and `state on the record the reasons for granting or denying [the summary judgment] motion.'" Grimes v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 11-7053 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 2, 2012) (per curiam) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)). Therefore, this Court directs the parties to..
More
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.
On March 2, 2012, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit remanded this action for the Court to "consider the effect of the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and `state on the record the reasons for granting or denying [the summary judgment] motion.'" Grimes v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 11-7053 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 2, 2012) (per curiam) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)). Therefore, this Court directs the parties to submit briefs addressing "the effect[on this case, if any,] of the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56," as well as, "the interaction of amended Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e) and the accompanying 2010 Advisory Committee Note, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55, and Local Rule 7(b)." Id. It is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiffs opening brief is due May 29, 2012; and it is further
ORDERED that defendants' brief is due June 28, 2012; and it is further
ORDERED that plaintiffs reply brief is due July 13, 2012.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
