KARPINIA v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF MEDICAL COLLEGES, 14-349(CKK). (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20140616952
Visitors: 28
Filed: Jun. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. On May 23, 2014, Defendants filed a [10] Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss"). Plaintiff is represented by Counsel. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d), Plaintiff was required to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by no later than June 9, 2014. As of the date of this Order, the public docket reflects that Plaintiff has not filed a response to Defendants' [10] Motion
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. On May 23, 2014, Defendants filed a [10] Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss"). Plaintiff is represented by Counsel. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d), Plaintiff was required to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by no later than June 9, 2014. As of the date of this Order, the public docket reflects that Plaintiff has not filed a response to Defendants' [10] Motion t..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
On May 23, 2014, Defendants filed a [10] Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss"). Plaintiff is represented by Counsel. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d), Plaintiff was required to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by no later than June 9, 2014. As of the date of this Order, the public docket reflects that Plaintiff has not filed a response to Defendants' [10] Motion to Dismiss nor has Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to respond to Defendants' Motion. Accordingly, the Court shall treat Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as conceded and dismiss the case. See LCvR 7(b) ("If such a memorandum is not filed within the prescribed time, the Court may treat the motion as conceded."). It is, this 13th day of June 2014, hereby
ORDERED that Defendants' [10] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; it is further
ORDERED that this case shall be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
