OPINION ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund ("Fund") is an "employee pension benefit plan" and "multiemployer plan" as defined by ERISA, and "a jointly administered trust fund established pursuant to" the LMRA, which is administered in the District of Columbia. (Compl. ¶ 4.) The individual Plaintiffs in this action, who administer the Fund for its beneficiaries, are authorized Trustees of the Fund and also fiduciaries as defined by ERISA. (Id. ¶ 5.) Plaintiffs have brought this action against Defendant Crystal Cleaning Systems, Inc. alleging that Defendant has failed to submit remittance reports, to pay required contributions and surcharges, and to pay interest and liquidated damages that it had accrued on late-paid contributions, in violation of collective bargaining agreements that Defendant has entered into with a local Service Employees International Union affiliate.

Plaintiffs filed the complaint in this matter on September 6, 2013, and served Defendant on September 18, 2013. (See Return of Service/Affidavit, ECF No. 4.) Defendant never responded to the complaint, and the Clerk of Court filed an entry of default on November 15, 2013. Plaintiffs moved for default judgment on December 16, 2013, and on February 4, 2014, this Court referred the matter to a Magistrate Judge for full casement management, up to but not including trial. The assigned Magistrate Judge, Deborah A. Robinson, issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12, attached hereto as Appendix A) regarding Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, which reflects her belief that Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment should be granted and that judgment should be entered against Defendant. (Report and Recommendation at 2.) Magistrate Judge Robinson further recommended that this Court order Defendant to conduct an accounting of unpaid contributions, submit outstanding remittance reports, and pay the corresponding contributions and related charges that are due and owing to the Fund. (Id. at 9-10.) The Report and Recommendation also advised the parties that either party may file written objections to the Report and Recommendation, which must include the portions of the findings and recommendations to which each objection is made and the basis for each such objection. (Id. at 11.) The Report and Recommendation further advised the parties that failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of further review of the matters addressed in the Report and Recommendation. (Id.)

Under this Court's local rules, any party who objects to a Report and Recommendation must file a written objection with the Clerk of the Court within 14 days of the party's receipt of the Report and Recommendation. LCvR 72.3(b). As of this date—over a month after the Report and Recommendation was issued—no objections have been filed.

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Robinson's report and will ADOPT the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. See LCvR 72.3(c) (district judge may accept in whole the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge); ITPE Pension Fund v. Stronghold Security, LLC, No. 13cv0025, 2014 WL 702580 (Feb. 25, 2014). Accordingly, the Court will GRANT Plaintiffs' motion and enter default judgment against Defendant. A separate order and judgment consistent with this opinion will follow.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiffs, an employee pension benefit plan administered in the District of Columbia and the individual Trustees of that plan, bring this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") and the Labor Management Relations Act ("LMRA") "to collect contractually required remittance reports, unpaid collectively bargained contributions, and interest owed by the Defendant." Complaint (Document No. 1) ¶ 1. This action was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for full case management, see 02/04/2014 Minute Order, following the Clerk's entry of default as to Defendant, see Default (Document No. 6); see also 11/25/2013 Minute Order (directing Plaintiffs either to move for default judgment or to file a stipulation of dismissal).

Pending for consideration by the undersigned is Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment (Document No. 7). The undersigned conducted a hearing on Plaintiffs' motion on February 27, 2014, at which Plaintiffs introduced evidence of the damages claimed, see Hearing Exhibit 1.1 Following the hearing, Plaintiffs, in accordance with the undersigned's order, filed a supplemental memorandum addressing their request for attorneys' fees. See Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Default Judgment ("Supplemental Memorandum") (Document No. 11). Upon consideration of Plaintiffs' motion, the memoranda in support thereof, the evidence presented, and the entire record herein, the undersigned will recommend that the court grant Plaintiffs' motion and enter default judgment against Defendant.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund ("Fund") is an "employee pension benefit plan" and "multiemployer plan" as defined by ERISA, and "a jointly administered trust fund established pursuant to" the LMRA, which is administered in the District of Columbia. Complaint ¶ 4. The Fund provides pension benefits to eligible employees. Id. The individual Plaintiffs are authorized Trustees of the Fund, and fiduciaries as defined by ERISA, who administer the Fund for its beneficiaries. Id. ¶ 5. Defendant Crystal Cleaning Systems, Inc. is an employer which was a party to collective bargaining agreements with the Service Employees International Union, Local 1877 ("Union") for its employees at certain work sites at which it provided janitorial services. Id. ¶¶ 8-9; Declaration of Kenneth J. Anderson, Jr. ("Declaration") (Document No. 7-1) ¶ 4.

Defendant and the Union entered into a collective bargaining agreement on November 6, 2006, under which Defendant was required to make monthly contributions to the Fund for covered employees. See Declaration ¶¶ 4, 6; Declaration, Exhibit A at 10. Initially, Defendant was required to contribute $0.15 an hour "for each hour worked by employees to the [Fund]." Declaration, Exhibit A at 10. The rate increased to $0.25 an hour effective July 1, 2007. Id. Beginning July 1, 2008, the rates were established based on the employees' "length of service"; Defendant was required to contribute $0.30 an hour for employees of one year, $0.40 an hour for employees of two years, and $0.50 an hour for employees of three years. Id. at 10-11. The parties renewed their collective bargaining agreement through three agreements — titled "Janitor I Agreement," "Janitor II Agreement," and "Janitor III Agreement" — effective November 1, 2009. Declaration ¶ 4; see also Complaint, Exhibit 1. Each of the three agreements established the rate at which Defendant was required to contribute to the Fund for covered employees — $0.30 an hour under the Janitor I Agreement, $0.40 an hour under the Janitor II Agreement, and $0.50 an hour under the Janitor III Agreement. Complaint, Exhibit 1 at 3, 10, 17.

Each agreement included an appendix, setting forth the terms of Defendant's participation in the Fund. The appendices provided, in pertinent part, that Defendant's "[c]ontributions shall be transmitted together with a remittance report containing such information, in such manner, and on such form as may be required by the Fund or their designee." Declaration, Exhibit A at 23; Complaint, Exhibit 1 at 6, 13, 20. The terms further provided that Defendant "agrees to be bound by the provisions of the Agreement and Declaration of Trust establishing the Fund ... and by all resolutions and rules adopted by the Trustees pursuant to the powers delegated to them by that agreement, including collection policies. ..." Declaration, Exhibit A at 23; Complaint, Exhibit 1 at 7, 14, 21.

The Agreement and Declaration of Trust ("Fund Agreement") reiterates the requirement that employers submit reports and contributions to the Fund, and sets forth the authority of the Fund's Trustees to develop rules and regulations governing the Fund's operation. Complaint, Exhibit 2 at 2, 5. In accordance with the terms of the collective bargaining agreements and the Fund Agreement, Trustees of the Fund promulgated policies concerning collection of delinquent contributions. Declaration ¶ 9; Complaint, Exhibit 3. The Fund's Statement of Policy for Collection of Delinquent Contributions stipulates that an employer that is delinquent in its Fund contributions shall be liable for interest, calculated from the date the contributions were due until the payment is received, at a rate of 10 percent per annum; liquidated damages, after a legal action is commenced, at 20 percent of the delinquent contributions; reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred.2 Declaration ¶¶ 10-11; Complaint, Exhibit 3 at 8-9 (Section 5).

In addition to the required contributions and the charges for late-paid contributions, employers were required to pay surcharges to the Fund as a result of the Fund's "critical status" in 2009 through 2013. Declaration ¶ 12. Because of its critical status, the Fund established a Rehabilitation Plan, in accordance with the Pension Protection Act of 2006, which imposed surcharge payments equal to five percent of an employer's contributions in November 2009, and 10 percent of its contributions for each month beginning in December 2009. Declaration ¶ 13; Complaint, Exhibit 4; see generally 29 U.S.C. 1085. Under the statute, failures to pay these surcharges are treated as delinquent contributions. 1085(e)(7)(B). Defendant was notified of the Fund's critical status, as well as the Rehabilitation Plan and required surcharges, through annual letters. Declaration ¶¶ 12-13; Complaint, Exhibit 4; Complaint, Exhibit 5.

Plaintiffs contend that beginning in 2007, in contravention of the parties' agreements, Defendant failed to submit required remittance reports, failed to pay required contributions and surcharges, and failed to pay interest and liquidated damages that it had accrued on late-paid contributions. Declaration ¶ 14; see also Hearing Exhibit 1. Defendant "became inactive" in the Fund effective March 1, 2013. Declaration ¶ 4.

After unsuccessfully attempting to collect the outstanding amounts from Defendant, Complaint ¶ 27, Plaintiffs initiated this matter. In October 2013, the court observed that Defendant's responsive pleading was overdue, and ordered that it be filed by a date certain. 10/17/2013 Minute Order. Defendant failed to respond, and Plaintiffs sought entry of default. The Clerk of Court entered default (Document No. 6) on November 15, 2013. In accordance with an order of the court, see 11/25/2013 Minute Order, Plaintiffs then moved for default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2).

APPLICABLE STANDARD

Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that "[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend ... the clerk must enter the party's default." Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). After the Clerk's entry of default, the party may then move for entry of default judgment by the court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). "The determination of whether default judgment is appropriate is committed to the discretion of the trial court." Fanning v. C & L Serv. Corp., 297 F.R.D. 162, 166 (D.D.C. 2013) (quoting Int'l Painters & Allied Trades Indus. Pension Fund v. Auxier Drywall, LLC, 531 F.Supp.2d 56, 57 (D.D.C. 2008)) (internal quotation marks omitted). The defendant "must be considered a totally unresponsive party and its default plainly wilful, reflected by its failure to respond to the summons and complaint, the entry of default, or the motion for default judgment." ITPE Pension Fund v. Stronghold Sec., LLC, No. 13-0025, 2014 WL 702580, at *1 (D.D.C. Feb. 25, 2014) (citations omitted) (quoting another source) (internal quotation marks omitted). "The standard for default judgment is satisfied where the defendant makes no request to set aside the default and no suggestion that it has a meritorious defense." Id. (citations omitted) (quoting another source); see also C & L Serv. Corp., 297 F.R.D. at 166.

"Entry of default by the Clerk of Court establishes the defaulting party's liability for the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint." C & L Serv. Corp., 297 F.R.D. at 166 (citation omitted). Unless the amount of damages is a sum certain, the court must make an "independent determination" and has "considerable latitude" in awarding a sum of damages. Id.; see also ITPE Pension Fund, 2014 WL 702580, at *1. The party moving for default judgment "must prove its entitlement to the amount of monetary damages requested using detailed affidavits or documentary evidence on which the court may rely." C & L Serv. Corp., 297 F.R.D. at 166 (citation omitted). The court may also conduct a hearing in order to determine the appropriate amount of damages. See id. (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2)).

DISCUSSION

Plaintiffs aver that "[j]urisdiction is conferred upon this Court" by 29 U.S.C. 185(c), 1132(e), (f); 28 U.S.C. 1331, and that "[v]enue is proper under" 29 U.S.C. 1132(e)(2) because the Fund is administered in the District of Columbia. Complaint ¶¶ 2, 3. Plaintiffs filed Proof of Service (Document No. 4) indicating that the individual designated to accept service on behalf of the corporate Defendant was served with the summons in this matter on September 18, 2013. Defendant has not filed an answer to Plaintiffs' complaint, no appearance has been entered on Defendant's behalf, and the Clerk of Court has entered default. Accordingly, the undersigned "adopts the well-pleaded allegations in the complaint as findings of fact regarding this matter." See C & L Serv. Corp., 297 F.R.D. at 167. Plaintiffs are thus entitled to default judgment for Defendant's failure to remit certain monthly reports, required contributions, interest charges, liquidated damages, and surcharges. See Complaint ¶ 22.

With respect to damages, Plaintiffs seek monetary relief for damages that they are able to calculate, and equitable relief for the damages that they are unable to calculate. See Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Support of Motion for Default Judgment ("Memorandum") (Document No. 7) at 9. In support of their request, Plaintiffs have provided the declaration of Kenneth J. Anderson, Jr., the Fund's Contribution Compliance Manager, who "maintain[s] the Fund's records, determine[s] whether participating employers have satisfied their obligations to make timely contributions to the Fund, and assist[s] in efforts to collect delinquent contributions from participating employers. ..." Declaration ¶ 2. Plaintiffs also submitted documentary exhibits in the form of copies of the parties' agreements and tables detailing the amounts owed, paid, and outstanding. The undersigned thus finds that Plaintiffs have established their entitlement to the requested relief, as outlined below.

Monetary damages for unpaid contributions, surcharges, interest, and liquidated damages

Under the Janitor I Agreement, Defendant owes $647.89 in contribution payments, $2,362.37 in surcharges, $1,039.03 in interest on late paid contributions, $2,528.12 in liquidated damages for late paid contributions, and additional interest that continues to accrue at a rate of 10 percent until payments have been made. Declaration ¶¶ 19-24; see also Hearing Exhibit 1. Under the Janitor II Agreement, Defendant owes $1,813.78 in surcharges, $864.06 in interest on late paid contributions, $1,901.28 in liquidated damages for late paid contributions, and additional interest that continues to accrue until payments have been made. Declaration ¶¶ 27-31; see also Hearing Exhibit 1. Under the Janitor III Agreement, Defendant owes $7,163.52 in surcharges, $2,595.03 in interest on late paid contributions, $6,933.05 in liquidated damages for late paid contributions, and additional interest that continues to accrue until payments have been made. Declaration ¶¶ 34-38; see also Hearing Exhibit 1.3

Attorneys' fees and costs

Plaintiffs are also entitled to $3,216 in attorneys' fees and $450 in costs that they incurred in this matter. See Supplemental Memorandum at 2. The undersigned finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated the reasonableness of their requested attorneys' fees through a declaration of their counsel, in which they set forth the rates of their counsel, and through invoices in which they outline the hours billed by their counsel. See Declaration of Diana M. Bardes in Support of Motion for Default Judgment and Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Document No. 11-1); id., Exhibit A. In support of their request for costs, Plaintiffs provide an invoice documenting the court's filing fee and a process server fee that they incurred while litigating this matter. See id., Exhibit A.

Equitable relief

Plaintiffs aver that they are unable to calculate the amount due and owing for the months in which Defendant failed to submit a remittance report, and thus seek an order requiring Defendant to conduct an accounting of past-due contributions, submit the outstanding remittance reports, and pay the due and owing amounts. Memorandum at 5. Plaintiffs request that the court retain jurisdiction over this matter pending Defendant's compliance with the court's order. Id. at 9. The undersigned finds that Plaintiffs are entitled to their requested relief. "ERISA authorizes the court to provide for other legal or equitable relief as the court deems appropriate." Int'l Painters & Allied Trades Indus. Pension Fund v. R.W. Amrine Drywall Co., 239 F.Supp.2d 26, 31 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing 29 U.S.C. 1132(g)(2)(E)); see also Serv. Emps. Int'l Nat'l Indus. Pension Fund v. Delta Window Cleaning Co., No. 12-00847, 2012 WL 3322368, at *2 (D.D.C. Aug. 14, 2012) (granting the plaintiffs' "request to enter a permanent injunction ordering defendant to submit its delinquent remittance reports, conduct an accounting on all past-due contributions, and pay all amounts due and owing to the Fund in accordance with its Agreement with the Fund and the Fund's governing documents").

Under the 2006 agreement, "Defendant failed to provide any reports or contributions for the entire effective period ... from April 2007 through October 2009." Declaration ¶ 15. Defendant failed to submit reports and contributions under the Janitor I Agreement for October 2012, December 2012, January 2013, and February 2013. Declaration ¶ 18; see also Hearing Exhibit 1. Defendant failed to submit reports and contributions for August 2012, October 2012, December 2012, January 2013, and February 2013 under the Janitor II Agreement. Declaration ¶ 26; see also Hearing Exhibit 1. Finally, Defendant failed to submit reports and contributions under the Janitor III Agreement for October 2012, December 2012, January 2013, and February 2013. Declaration ¶ 33; see also Hearing Exhibit 1. For these months, Defendant owes contributions, interest, liquidated damages, and surcharges, in accordance with the rates set forth in the respective agreements. See Declaration ¶¶ 16, 18, 26, 33.

CONCLUSION

For all of the foregoing reasons, it is, this 13th day of June, 2014,

RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment (Document No. 7) be GRANTED, and that judgment be entered against Defendant in the amount of $28,913.47, plus additional interest at a rate of 10 percent that continues to accrue until payment is received, to account for:4

(1) $647.89 in delinquent contributions;

(2) $4,498.12 in interest on late-paid contributions;

(3) $11,362.45 in liquidated damages;

(4) $11,339.67 in surcharges;

(5) $3,666 in attorneys' fees and costs; and it is

FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the court order Defendant to conduct an accounting of unpaid contributions, submit outstanding remittance reports, and pay the corresponding contributions and related charges that are due and owing to the Fund.

Within fourteen days, any party may file written objections to this report and recommendation. The objections shall specifically identify the portions of the findings and recommendations to which objection is made and the basis of each such objection. In the absence of timely objections, further review of issues addressed herein may be deemed waived.