REED v. GRAY, 14-2134 (KBJ). (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20150223749
Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss Complaint (ECF No. 4) filed on behalf of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and Defendant Vincent Gray and the District of Columbia's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF No. 6). The Court advised the plaintiff of her obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond each motion. The Court's December 24, 2014 Or
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss Complaint (ECF No. 4) filed on behalf of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and Defendant Vincent Gray and the District of Columbia's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF No. 6). The Court advised the plaintiff of her obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond each motion. The Court's December 24, 2014 Ord..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss Complaint (ECF No. 4) filed on behalf of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and Defendant Vincent Gray and the District of Columbia's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF No. 6). The Court advised the plaintiff of her obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond each motion.
The Court's December 24, 2014 Order (ECF No. 5) set January 23, 2015 as the deadline for plaintiff's response to the federal defendant's motion, and the January 2, 2015 Order (ECF No. 7) set February 2, 2015 as the deadline for her response to the District of Columbia defendants' motion. Each Order warned plaintiff that, if she failed to file a timely opposition, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. To date, plaintiff has not filed an opposition to either motion, or requested more time to file an opposition, or advised the Court of any change of address. The Court, therefore, will grant defendants' motions as conceded and will dismiss this action. An Order is issued separately.
Source: Leagle
