ESTATE OF KLIEMAN v. PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, 04-1173 (PLF). (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20150304b46
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER PAUL L. FRIEDMAN , District Judge . Upon consideration of defendants Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organization's Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion [Dkt. No. 282] for admission pro hac vice of Gassan A. Baloul is DENIED. If Mr. Baloul practices law from an office located in the District of Columbia, he must either be a member of the District of Columbia Bar or have an application pending. See Local Civil Rule 83.2(d)(6). O
Summary: ORDER PAUL L. FRIEDMAN , District Judge . Upon consideration of defendants Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organization's Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion [Dkt. No. 282] for admission pro hac vice of Gassan A. Baloul is DENIED. If Mr. Baloul practices law from an office located in the District of Columbia, he must either be a member of the District of Columbia Bar or have an application pending. See Local Civil Rule 83.2(d)(6). Ot..
More
ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Upon consideration of defendants Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organization's Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, it is hereby
ORDERED that the motion [Dkt. No. 282] for admission pro hac vice of Gassan A. Baloul is DENIED. If Mr. Baloul practices law from an office located in the District of Columbia, he must either be a member of the District of Columbia Bar or have an application pending. See Local Civil Rule 83.2(d)(6). Otherwise, he is engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. See DCCA Rule 49.
Source: Leagle
