MEMORANDUM & ORDER

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.

GRANTING DEFENDANT'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO REQUEST NO. 11-351-P Re Document No. 132.

Pro se Plaintiff Jeremy Pinson is currently an inmate at ADX Florence, a federal prison located in Colorado. While in prison, Mr. Pinson sent numerous Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") requests to various federal agencies. Dissatisfied with several agencies' responses to his requests, Mr. Pinson filed a lengthy complaint in this Court, to which several agencies, including the Department of Justice's ("DOJ") Criminal Division, responded with pre-answer motions. See Corr. 2d. Am. Compl. at 9, ECF No. 32; see generally Def.'s Mot. Dismiss Summ. J., ECF No. 48.

On September 24, 2014, this Court ruled on the DOJ's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Mr. Pinson's claims against the Criminal Division, granting it in part, but ordering the Criminal Division to conduct a search for, and subsequently release to Mr. Pinson, any responsive documents relating to the portion of Request No. 11-351-P that pertained to the Criminal Division's 2011 Budget. See Pinson v. Dep't of Justice, No. 12-1872, 2014 WL 4724379 at *1, *6 (D.D.C. Sept. 24, 2014); see Order, ECF No. 111. Having subsequently conducted a search yielding the budget document at issue, and having provided it to Mr. Pinson, the DOJ now renews its Motion for Summary Judgment regarding Request No. 11-351-P, which the Court will grant.1

The DOJ correctly argues that the final remnant of Mr. Pinson's FOIA claim against it has been rendered moot, as the Criminal Division properly released the remaining information sought by Plaintiff in Request No. 11-351-P. See Def.'s Renewed Mot. Summ. J., ECF No. 132. To support this assertion, the DOJ has attached a declaration indicating that the Criminal Division released the document ordered by the Court, see Second Cunningham Decl., ¶4, ECF No. 132-1, a copy of the letter sent to Mr. Pinson accompanying the document at issue, and a copy of the "2011 Budget" document that was released to plaintiff. See Pinson Letter, Ex. 1., ECF No. 132-1; see "Criminal Division FY 2011 President's Budget," Ex. 1, ECF 132-1. This is sufficient for this Court to grant the Criminal Division's motion, as FOIA claims become moot where a defendant can show the release of all requested information, provided there is no dispute by the plaintiff. See Isasi v. Office of Att'y Gen., 594 F.Supp.2d 12, 14 (D.D.C. 2009); see also Crooker v. United States State Dep't, 628 F.2d 9, 10 (D.C. Cir. 1980) ("Once the records are produced, the substance of the controversy disappears and becomes moot since the disclosure which the suit seeks has already been made."). Mr. Pinson has not responded to the Criminal Division's motion, or disputed the fact that the Criminal division has now provided him the information sought in Request No. 11-351-P.

Accordingly, Defendant's renewed motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 132) is GRANTED.

It is hereby ORDERED that JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of the DOJ as to the remainder of Plaintiff's Request No. 11-351-P.

SO ORDERED.