Filed: Dec. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER ROYCE C. LAMBERTH , District Judge . Upon consideration of petitioner's Motion [453] for an Order to Show Cause, respondents' Response and petitioner's Reply thereto, the arguments made in open court on November 24, 2015, the entire record in this case, and the applicable law, it is hereby ORDERED that petitioner's Motion is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that respondents shall, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, file with the Court an explanation of the inconsistenci
Summary: ORDER ROYCE C. LAMBERTH , District Judge . Upon consideration of petitioner's Motion [453] for an Order to Show Cause, respondents' Response and petitioner's Reply thereto, the arguments made in open court on November 24, 2015, the entire record in this case, and the applicable law, it is hereby ORDERED that petitioner's Motion is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that respondents shall, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, file with the Court an explanation of the inconsistencie..
More
ORDER
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Upon consideration of petitioner's Motion [453] for an Order to Show Cause, respondents' Response and petitioner's Reply thereto, the arguments made in open court on November 24, 2015, the entire record in this case, and the applicable law, it is hereby
ORDERED that petitioner's Motion is DENIED. It is further
ORDERED that respondents shall, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, file with the Court an explanation of the inconsistencies identified in the Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order between (1) respondents' counsel's statements at the November 24, 2015 hearing in this case, (2) Respondents' Status Report Regarding Petitioner's Legal Materials Ex. A, ECF No. 475-1 (Decl. of Col. David E. Heath), and (3) Respondents' Status Report Regarding Petitioner's Legal Materials Ex. B, ECF No. 475-2 (Andrew I. Warden's February 26, 2014 email).
It is SO ORDERED.
