Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. FORD, 15-0025(PLF). (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Columbia Number: infdco20160205973 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER PAUL L. FRIEDMAN , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby ORDERED that Fenwick's motion to compel, Dkt. 103, is DENIED as moot; it is FURTHER ORDERED that Grant's motion to compel is DENIED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that Hager's motion to compel is DENIED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that Sanders's motion to compel is DENIED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that Grant's motion to exclude cooperating witness testimony, Dkt. 117, is DEN
More

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that Fenwick's motion to compel, Dkt. 103, is DENIED as moot; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Grant's motion to compel is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Hager's motion to compel is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Sanders's motion to compel is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Grant's motion to exclude cooperating witness testimony, Dkt. 117, is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Grant's motion for a reliability hearing, Dkt. 122, is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Ford's motion to exclude cooperating witness testimony and request for a reliability hearing is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Fenwick's motion to exclude cooperating witness testimony and request for a reliability hearing is DENIED as moot; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Hager's motion to exclude cooperating witness testimony and request for a reliability hearing is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Leach's motion to exclude cooperating witness testimony and request for a reliability hearing is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Ford's motion to compel, Dkt. 119, is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Grant's motion to compel is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Hager's motion to compel is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Sanders's motion to compel is DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Leach's motion to compel is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer