PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby
ORDERED that Fenwick's motion to compel, Dkt. 103, is DENIED as moot; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Grant's motion to compel is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Hager's motion to compel is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Sanders's motion to compel is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Grant's motion to exclude cooperating witness testimony, Dkt. 117, is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Grant's motion for a reliability hearing, Dkt. 122, is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Ford's motion to exclude cooperating witness testimony and request for a reliability hearing is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Fenwick's motion to exclude cooperating witness testimony and request for a reliability hearing is DENIED as moot; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Hager's motion to exclude cooperating witness testimony and request for a reliability hearing is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Leach's motion to exclude cooperating witness testimony and request for a reliability hearing is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Ford's motion to compel, Dkt. 119, is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Grant's motion to compel is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Hager's motion to compel is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Sanders's motion to compel is DENIED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Leach's motion to compel is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.