Benton v. Bank of America Corporation, 15-843 (JEB). (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20160210c33
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 09, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. BOASBERG , District Judge . As set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court ORDERS that: 1. The Bank Defendants' [2] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART; 2. The Ocwen Defendants' [4] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART; 3. Seterus's [17] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART; 4. Wilmington's [21] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART; 5. Plaintiffs' [5] Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 6. The case is TRANSFERRED to the Distric
Summary: ORDER JAMES E. BOASBERG , District Judge . As set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court ORDERS that: 1. The Bank Defendants' [2] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART; 2. The Ocwen Defendants' [4] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART; 3. Seterus's [17] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART; 4. Wilmington's [21] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART; 5. Plaintiffs' [5] Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 6. The case is TRANSFERRED to the District..
More
ORDER
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
As set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court ORDERS that:
1. The Bank Defendants' [2] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART;
2. The Ocwen Defendants' [4] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART;
3. Seterus's [17] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART;
4. Wilmington's [21] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART;
5. Plaintiffs' [5] Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
6. The case is TRANSFERRED to the District of Maryland.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
