Carter-Frost v. District of Columbia, 15-930 (EGS). (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20180410832
Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER EMMET G. SULLIVAN , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's gender discrimination claim is DENIED. Only Ms. Carter-Frost's gender discrimination regarding the defendant's decision to laterally transfer her to the Fifth District for patrol work may proceed; and it is further ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's r
Summary: ORDER EMMET G. SULLIVAN , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's gender discrimination claim is DENIED. Only Ms. Carter-Frost's gender discrimination regarding the defendant's decision to laterally transfer her to the Fifth District for patrol work may proceed; and it is further ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's re..
More
ORDER
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion it is hereby
ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's gender discrimination claim is DENIED. Only Ms. Carter-Frost's gender discrimination regarding the defendant's decision to laterally transfer her to the Fifth District for patrol work may proceed; and it is further
ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's retaliation claim is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's hostile work environment claim is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
