Taylor-Cotten v. District of Columbia, 16-cv-2036 (KBJ). (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20180510965
Visitors: 31
Filed: May 09, 2018
Latest Update: May 09, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON , District Judge . On September 27, 2017, the defendants in this matter filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint. ( See Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 19.) The Local Civil Rules of this Court provide that "[w]ithin 14 days of the date of service or at such other time as the court may direct, an opposing party shall serve and file a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the motion [or] the Court may treat the motion as conce
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON , District Judge . On September 27, 2017, the defendants in this matter filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint. ( See Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 19.) The Local Civil Rules of this Court provide that "[w]ithin 14 days of the date of service or at such other time as the court may direct, an opposing party shall serve and file a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the motion [or] the Court may treat the motion as conced..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, District Judge.
On September 27, 2017, the defendants in this matter filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint. (See Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 19.) The Local Civil Rules of this Court provide that "[w]ithin 14 days of the date of service or at such other time as the court may direct, an opposing party shall serve and file a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the motion [or] the Court may treat the motion as conceded." LCvR 7(b). To date, plaintiff's counsel has neither filed an opposition to the motion nor requested more time to do so. Therefore, the Court will GRANT the defendants' motion as conceded and will DISMISS this action without prejudice.
A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Source: Leagle