U.S. ex rel. Keaveney v. SRA International, Inc., 13-855. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20190118787
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER EMMET G. SULLIVAN , District Judge . On February 3, 2017, the Court referred this case to Magistrate Judge Harvey for full case management. SRA International, Inc. and Systems Research Application Corporation, and Triton Services, Inc. (collectively "defendants") moved to dismiss the Relators' amended complaint, which alleges that defendants violated the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq. Magistrate Judge Harvey issued a Report and Recommendation on May 7, 2018. The Court h
Summary: ORDER EMMET G. SULLIVAN , District Judge . On February 3, 2017, the Court referred this case to Magistrate Judge Harvey for full case management. SRA International, Inc. and Systems Research Application Corporation, and Triton Services, Inc. (collectively "defendants") moved to dismiss the Relators' amended complaint, which alleges that defendants violated the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq. Magistrate Judge Harvey issued a Report and Recommendation on May 7, 2018. The Court ha..
More
ORDER
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
On February 3, 2017, the Court referred this case to Magistrate Judge Harvey for full case management. SRA International, Inc. and Systems Research Application Corporation, and Triton Services, Inc. (collectively "defendants") moved to dismiss the Relators' amended complaint, which alleges that defendants violated the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. Magistrate Judge Harvey issued a Report and Recommendation on May 7, 2018. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and, having received no objections to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.3(b), accepts the findings and adopts the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Harvey contained in the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
