Entes Industrial Plants Construction and Erection Contracting Co. v. Kyrgyz Republic, 18-2228 (RC). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20191018990
Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE PETITION TO CONFIRM FOREIGN ARBITRATION AWARD FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS ; CONFIRMING THE PETITION AS TO THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC; AND ORDERING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING Re Documents Nos. 1, 19. RUDOLPH CONTRERAS , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion separately and contemporaneously issued, the Petitioner's Petition to Confirm and Enforce Arbitral Award (ECF No
Summary: ORDER DENYING RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE PETITION TO CONFIRM FOREIGN ARBITRATION AWARD FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS ; CONFIRMING THE PETITION AS TO THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC; AND ORDERING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING Re Documents Nos. 1, 19. RUDOLPH CONTRERAS , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion separately and contemporaneously issued, the Petitioner's Petition to Confirm and Enforce Arbitral Award (ECF No...
More
ORDER
DENYING RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE PETITION TO CONFIRM FOREIGN ARBITRATION AWARD FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS; CONFIRMING THE PETITION AS TO THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC; AND ORDERING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
Re Documents Nos. 1, 19.
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion separately and contemporaneously issued, the Petitioner's Petition to Confirm and Enforce Arbitral Award (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED IN PART and the Respondents' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19) is DENIED. It is hereby:
ORDERED that the Petition is GRANTED as to the Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Kyrgyz Republic; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file supplemental briefs with the Court on or before November 16, 2019, as described in the Memorandum Opinion.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
