SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
At Wilmington this 24
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for entry of a scheduling order and protective order (D.I. 496) is granted in part and denied in part,
1. The court has lifted the stay in the above captioned litigation ("the Civil Action"). The question is how to proceed in light of the parallel proceedings in United States v. Wilmington Trust Corporation, David Gibson, Robert V.A. Harra, William North, and Kevyn Rakowski, Crim. No. 15-23-RGA (D. Del.) ("the Criminal Action," with the named defendants being designated as "the individual defendants"). The court is mindful that:
2. Balancing all of these interests, the court concludes that both the schedule and the protective order proposed by plaintiffs require some modification. The court will modify the schedule to complete fact and expert discovery in the Civil Action prior to trial in the Criminal Action; the summary judgment exercise and trial in the Civil Action will commence at the conclusion of trial in the Criminal Action. With respect to the protective order, all deposition testimony and written discovery responses in the Civil Action shall be promptly disclosed or made available to the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Delaware ("the USAO"), and can only be used "to impeach witnesses that may testify in the Criminal Action in accordance with the Federal Rules of Evidence." (D.I. 498, ex. B at 2) The protective order shall be modified to better balance the Fifth Amendment concerns of the individual defendants with the goal of encouraging meaningful discovery in the Civil Action, that is, the deposition testimony and written discovery responses related to the individual defendants shall not be disclosed to the USAO until the close of the government's case-in-chief in the Criminal Action.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
1. All fact discovery shall be completed on or before
2. All expert discovery shall be completed on or before
3. All summary judgment motions and opening briefs shall be filed on
4. A pretrial conference shall be conducted on
5. Trial shall commence on
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the proposed supplemental protective order (D.I. 498, ex. B) shall be modified to provide that the deposition testimony and written discovery responses of the individual defendants shall
Keating v. Office of Thrift Supervision, 45 F.3d 322, 326 (9