Filed: Feb. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2018
Summary: RECOMMENDATION BK No. 16-10386-CSS. BAP 18-8. MARY PAT THYNGE , Chief Magistrate Judge . At Wilmington this 27th day of February, 2018. WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, a teleconference was held on Friday, February 23, 2018 for an initial review and discussion with appellant, counsel for appellee and counsel for the trustee to determine the appropria
Summary: RECOMMENDATION BK No. 16-10386-CSS. BAP 18-8. MARY PAT THYNGE , Chief Magistrate Judge . At Wilmington this 27th day of February, 2018. WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, a teleconference was held on Friday, February 23, 2018 for an initial review and discussion with appellant, counsel for appellee and counsel for the trustee to determine the appropriat..
More
RECOMMENDATION
BK No. 16-10386-CSS. BAP 18-8.
MARY PAT THYNGE, Chief Magistrate Judge.
At Wilmington this 27th day of February, 2018.
WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, a teleconference was held on Friday, February 23, 2018 for an initial review and discussion with appellant, counsel for appellee and counsel for the trustee to determine the appropriateness of mediation in these matters;
WHEREAS, as a result of the above screening process, the issues involved in these cases are not amenable to mediation and mediation at this stage would not be a productive exercise, a worthwhile use of judicial resources nor warrant the expense of the process.
THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), these matters be withdrawn from the mandatory referral for mediation and proceed through the appellate process of this Court.
The parties have advised there will be no objections filed to this Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a) and D. DEL. LR 72.1.
The parties request that a scheduling order for briefing be entered.
Local counsel are obligated to inform out-of-state counsel of this Order.
