Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re Energy Future Holdings, 18-1769-RGA. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Delaware Number: infdco20181221e49 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2018
Summary: RECOMMENDATION Bankruptcy Case No. 14-10979 (CSS) BAP 18-00051 MARY PAT THYNGE , Chief Magistrate Judge . At Wilmington this 20 th day of December, 2018 . WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, the court conducted an initial review, which included information from counsel, to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter; WHEREAS, as a result
More

RECOMMENDATION

Bankruptcy Case No. 14-10979 (CSS)

BAP 18-00051

At Wilmington this 20th day of December, 2018.

WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, the court conducted an initial review, which included information from counsel, to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter;

WHEREAS, as a result of the above screening process, the issues involved in this case are not amenable to mediation and mediation at this stage would not be a productive exercise, a worthwhile use of judicial resources nor warrant the expense of the process.

The parties have engaged in informal discussions regarding the issues to this appeal, but have not reached a consensual resolution. The parties request that the following briefing schedule be entered:

Appellant's Opening Brief 42 days from the date this Court enters an order approving a briefing schedule in this appeal Appellees' Opening Brief 42 day after service of Appellant's opening brief Appellant's Reply Brief 21 days after service of Appellees' Opening Brief

THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter be withdrawn from the mandatory referral for mediation and proceed through the appellate process of this Court. No objections are anticipated to this Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a) and D. DEL. LR 72.1 because the Recommendation is consistent with the parties' request.

Local counsel are obligated to inform out-of-state counsel of this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer