Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re Landsource Communities Development, LLC, 18-1793-CFC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Delaware Number: infdco20181221e50 Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2018
Summary: RECOMMENDATION Bankruptcy Case No. 08-11111 (KJC) BAP 18-53 MARY PAT THYNGE , Chief Magistrate Judge . At Wilmington this 20 th day of December, 2018 . WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, the court conducted an initial review, which included information from counsel, to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter; WHEREAS, as a result of
More

RECOMMENDATION

Bankruptcy Case No. 08-11111 (KJC)

BAP 18-53

At Wilmington this 20th day of December, 2018.

WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, the court conducted an initial review, which included information from counsel, to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter;

WHEREAS, as a result of the above screening process, the issues involved in this case are not amenable to mediation and mediation at this stage would not be a productive exercise, a worthwhile use of judicial resources nor warrant the expense of the process.

Due to the relief granted by the Bankruptcy Court, an order directing the dismissal of a civil case in California, neither party believes mediation is appropriate for this matter. Neither Appellant nor Appellees are nor were previously involved in any ADR process.

The parties request that the following briefing schedule be entered:

Appellant's Opening Brief January 14. 2019 Appellee's Answering Brief March 15, 2019

THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter be withdrawn from the mandatory referral for mediation and proceed through the appellate process of this Court. No objections are anticipated to this Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a) and D. DEL. LR 72.1 because the Recommendation is consistent with the parties' request.

Local counsel are obligated to inform out-of-state counsel of this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer