MARY PAT THYNGE, Chief Magistrate Judge.
At Wilmington this
WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, the court conducted an initial review, which included information from counsel, to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter;
WHEREAS, as a result of the above screening process, the issues involved in this case are not amenable to mediation and mediation at this stage would not be a productive exercise, a worthwhile use of judicial resources nor warrant the expense of the process.
Due to the relief granted by the Bankruptcy Court, an order directing the dismissal of a civil case in California, neither party believes mediation is appropriate for this matter. Neither Appellant nor Appellees are nor were previously involved in any ADR process.
The parties request that the following briefing schedule be entered:
THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter be withdrawn from the mandatory referral for mediation and proceed through the appellate process of this Court. No objections are anticipated to this Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a) and D. DEL. LR 72.1 because the Recommendation is consistent with the parties' request.
Local counsel are obligated to inform out-of-state counsel of this Order.