Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

AgroFresh Inc. v. Mirtech, Inc., 16-662 (MN) (SRF). (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Delaware Number: infdco20190103768 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARYELLEN NOREIKA , District Judge . WHEREAS, on December 11, 2019, Magistrate Judge Fallon issued a Report and Recommendation (D.I. 338); WHEREAS, the Report and Recommendation recommends that the Court GRANT the MirTech defendants' "Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Court Order and Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure" (D.I. 178); WHEREAS, no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 2nd day of January 2019 that:
More

ORDER

WHEREAS, on December 11, 2019, Magistrate Judge Fallon issued a Report and Recommendation (D.I. 338);

WHEREAS, the Report and Recommendation recommends that the Court GRANT the MirTech defendants' "Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Court Order and Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure" (D.I. 178);

WHEREAS, no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 2nd day of January 2019 that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (D.I. 338) is ADOPTED as to the Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 178) and that motion is GRANTED.

2. Defendants MirTech, Inc. and Nazir Mir are hereby DISMISSED.

3. The caption of this case is hereby amended as follows:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AGROFRESH INC., Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 16-662 (MN) (SRF) ESSENTIV LLC, DECCO U.S. POST-HARVEST, INC., CEREXAGRI, INC. d/b/a DECCO POST-HARVEST, and UPL, LTD., Defendants.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer