Filed: Jan. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2019
Summary: RECOMMENDATION Bankruptcy Case No. 17-12958-CSS BAP No. 18-00057 MARY PAT THYNGE , Chief Magistrate Judge . WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern: Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, the court conducted an initial review, which included information from counsel, to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter; WHEREAS, as a result of the above screening process, the issues involve
Summary: RECOMMENDATION Bankruptcy Case No. 17-12958-CSS BAP No. 18-00057 MARY PAT THYNGE , Chief Magistrate Judge . WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern: Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, the court conducted an initial review, which included information from counsel, to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter; WHEREAS, as a result of the above screening process, the issues involved..
More
RECOMMENDATION
Bankruptcy Case No. 17-12958-CSS
BAP No. 18-00057
MARY PAT THYNGE, Chief Magistrate Judge.
WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern: Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, the court conducted an initial review, which included information from counsel, to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter;
WHEREAS, as a result of the above screening process, the issues involved in this case are not amenable to mediation and mediation at this stage would not be a productive exercise, a worthwhile use of judicial resources nor warrant the expense of the process.
THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy court for this District and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter be withdrawn from the mandatory referral for mediation and proceed through the appellate process of this Court. Since this Recommendation is consistent with the parties request, no objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), FED. R. CIv. P. 72(a) and D. DEL LR 72.1 are anticipated.
IT IS ORDERED that counsel are to file their agreed upon/proposed briefing schedule for review and signature by Judge Noreika.
Local counsel are obligated to inform out-of-state counsel of this Order.
